Friday, October 18, 2013





Holly Thompson; "Fixed Fluidity;" Porcelain, wood, marker

Unique plasticity regulated by a specific set of rules while contained by specific boundaries.

The peephole refers to the act of consciously "gendering" a subject, with the viewer's gaze reflected.

Delicate but strong, translucent but opaque, liquid turned solid, we are full of contradictions.

This semester the class has spent a lot of time in the bathroom.


5 comments:

  1. I really enjoy Holly's work normally but I loved this piece. She uses such a small thing to question such a huge issue. I wish that there was a better way to post this piece to the blog. I feel like this is a piece that is hard to visualize without actually being there. The porcelain as the material was great based on the last line of your statement.

    ReplyDelete
  2. It is such a tiny space and then when you look in, it feels like you are there.I know its not about the space you created, but I like that about it.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I still think it is crazy that we both were going to do peephole projects (except mine didn't workout) without even knowing each others concepts.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Favorite comments:

    That you have a peephole set up in a bathroom also adds an element of banality to the collection and display of gender as a set example from which specimens can be taken and used as an educational tool, even when it is in reality extremely variable.

    I feel like a lot of your work deals with cues that create a thought inside the viewer and you do it very well.

    I like how the viewer is made to get right up on the piece to experience it. I also like how your piece generated curiosity in everyone.

    I see your gradient theme in the light coming through the porcelain, but this time it is jumbled and crystalized--chaotic, poetic, elusive...the porcelain pieces become a non-linear gradient.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I wish that there was a way to see this piece better through the photographs, because with the photos presented I am just a little bit confused. The idea seems to be a strong one and the statement feels well written, but as someone who did not get to see the piece in person I do not understand.

    ReplyDelete